Or
In this process, the surface responds as the roof of an empty cavern collapses.
Acidic water continues to desolve soluable rock and enlarge caverns. Moving water carries
suspended material through the cavern system. Not shown here, the water often reaches the surface
via springs and streams.
Karst on Mars?
Where did all the lava go?
Recently NASA, and Malin Space Science
Systems, have come out with a photographic "discovery" of the
possibility of liquid water somewhere just below the surface of the red planet.
And now, in December 2000, as I am about to put this on the internet, the spin on the
latest Mars images is all about layered stratigraphy, deposited by water.
Ha! It has always been there -- for the looking. For quite a long time now, many people (working with poorer images) have been theorizing about that possibility,
along with the logical prediction of some form of life, however small or strange,
existing in that water. In various ways, they have been ridiculed for such
thinking - or simply forgotten.
What ever happened to the 1980 photographic discovery (Viking images only
seconds apart!) by Dr. Leonard Martin (Lowell Observatory) of a possibly active
WATER SPOUT
on the surface of Mars? Can, or will, that particular piece of Martian real estate
be reimaged? I can't think of better evidence for geological activity than this. Perhaps
a volcanic eruption would be better evidence -- something that really hits them over the
head.
What about the Viking Label Release experiments? Time to have another look
at this.
Hopefully the water spout will be revisited. Or perhaps it went
the way of the Viking label Release experiments, Cydonia, The Face, and who
knows what else was missed - DISmissed. For, sadly, this seems to be a reoccuring
theme in the history of science and academia - a power game, a control game of information, and the
dispensing of and search for information -- where it seems only some establishment
organizations (and a select group of their affiliates) can investigate and present
such theories and evidence without suffering rejection
and ridicule.
Understandably, the scientific method requires that after possible
evidence there must be proof. Surely, the latest images are incredible. And I certainly
do not offer this work as final proof of anything. We need to walk on, and dig into
the Martian geology for that.
However, I do believe this small study deals with a piece of the puzzle, and shows
possible evidence of karst topography - if not in Cydonia, then elsewhere on Mars.
Perhaps the "new" images recently presented on CNN News, and subsequently various other
sources such as Space.com, show a recent event on Mars - water escaping to the surface
and eroding the soft materials there before boiling away. Perhaps they were just
missed before.
OK, fine. Missing is ok - if followed by acknowledgement. Doubting
is fine - even necessary. But then, speculating is also fine, even necessary.
Waiting for better evidence -- of course! Of course, the more images, the better understanding.
In my mind, the latest images are not exposing the stratified layers all that clearly. They
really are just clearer, sharper images of the same old topography.
OK -- nothing wrong with clearer, sharper images. Hopefully these images will provide plenty
of incentive to design and build something that can give us a closer (more clear) view of the layers,
and peer into holes as well. For instance, something that can fly and hover.
That old water spout and the recently "discovered" gullies and layered rock are
important to a discussion of karst topography on Mars. For where there is (were) water, soluble
rock, and carbonic dioxide, there will be (were) karst processes in action.
Although sinkholes are formed on the surface, most of erosion and deposition from karst processes
happens underground. And what happens below absolutely effects the topography above.
Springs, geysers, vents, and streams from solution caves, or volcanic sources, start below
ground and influence all surface structures above. In order for sinkholes to form,
certain underground mechanisms have to be in place. Erosion and deposition in a cavern
system occurs in much the same way as it does on the surface - flowing into streams,
cutting new paths, and depositing materials elsewhere. Such is the dynamics - the very nature - of a
geologically active, rocky (and watery) planet.
Whatever the case, one thing is for certain. We - humankind - must have many many
more images of the red planet, and do many more experiments, before passing judgement on
anyone's theory - about ANY part of Mars. We need to kick up the dirt, climb into holes
and down "craters". These new NASA "discoveries" give - at last - albeit silently - some
credibility to all previous theories, about fluid, life giving, water on Mars. And now,
the question is: Will anyone stand up and acknowledge the debunked and forgotten efforts
of the past?